DS-CO1-2301E-IP03.FG=RC+CD+CD+C+RC+C

xlsx

School

Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Sciences & Technology, Nawabshah *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

LQB185

Subject

Accounting

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

xlsx

Pages

2

Uploaded by dhandeepthiara

Report
Core 1 — Integrated Problem 3 Ref. Minimum Proficiency Indicator (MPI) Description CPA Way N/P/Y Feedback 1 Identifies the financial reporting issue Situation Y 2 Analyzes whether the fee is a separately identifiable component, using case facts Analyze Y 3 Analyze Y 4 — measurement Analyze P 5 — collection Analyze N 6 Recommends when to record revenue for each customer situation, consistent with analysis Conclude Y 7 Concludes on the impact of the adjustment on the management group bonus Conclude Y NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. RC NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. RC C CD 1 Analyze Y 2 Analyze Y 3 Designs an additional valid procedure to address the risk identified for the design contracts Analyze Y NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. CD NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. RC C CD 1 Identifies that the exchange of land for furniture is a non-monetary transaction Situation Y 2 Analyze Y 3 — ordinary course of business Analyze Y 4 — fair value reliably measurable Analyze Y 5 — non-monetary non-reciprocal transfer to owners Analyze Y 6 Recommends the amount at which the transaction should be measured, consistent with analysis Conclude Y 7 Concludes on the impact of the adjustment on the management group bonus Conclude Y NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. CD NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. RC C CD 1 Analyze Y 2 Analyze Y 3 Designs an additional valid procedure to address the risk identified for the non-monetary transaction Analyze N NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. AO1 (Financial Reporting — Design contracts ) You were assessed at RC for this assessment opportunity. You did a good job of identifying valid criteria for revenue in addressing the design contract in your discussion. However, your analysis lacked depth. In order to improve to a C on future cases, more depth is needed when discussing accounting issues. To do this, you also needed to discuss the criteria in line with the case facts and correctly conclude if it is met or not met to show how these applied to this specific situation. You ultimately arrive at the right conclusion, but the steps to get there need to be further strengthened. Please revisit MPI 4 and 5. Your recommendation is in line with your analysis. Analyzes the revenue recognition criteria in relation to case facts: ASPE 3400 — performance The candidate attempts to discuss the accounting treatment of the design contracts ( Yes on 2 MPIs OR Partial on 4 MPIs ). The candidate discusses the accounting treatment of the design contracts ( Yes on MPIs 1-6 ). The candidate thoroughly discusses the accounting treatment of the design contracts and discusses the impact of the issue on the management group bonus ( Yes on all ). AO2 (Assurance — Design contracts audit procedures ) Discusses a valid risk related to the design contracts Occurrence of Revenue ( Yes = explains the risk + why it is a risk , incorporating case facts) You were assessed at CD for this assessment opportunity. Great work on these audit procedures. You were clearly able to identify a relevant audit risk and provide procedures on how to mitigate the risks. Awesome job outlining how the procedure will be completed (including what specific pieces of evidence will be used). You are right. It is important that procedures list what are you doing, why and how it will be done to be complete. Keep it up! Designs a valid procedure to address the risk identified for the design contracts ( Yes = procedure is specific, clear, and useful in responding to the risk identified) The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the design contracts and attempts to design a valid procedure to address the risk ( Yes on 1 MPI OR Partial on 2 MPIs ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the design contracts and designs a valid procedure to address the risks ( Yes on 2 MPIs, including MPI 1 ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the design contracts and designs 2 valid procedures to address the risks ( Yes on all ). AO3 (Financial Reporting — Non-monetary transaction ) You were assessed at CD for this assessment opportunity. You clearly identified the issue, use case facts against the relevant ASPE criteria and you also provided a recommendation and explained the impact on the financial statements and bonus to meet your stakeholder's needs. Analyzes the non-monetary transaction measurement criteria in relation to case facts: ASPE 3831 — commercial substance The candidate attempts to discuss the accounting treatment of the non-monetary transaction ( Yes on 2 MPIs OR Partial on 4 MPIs ). The candidate discusses the accounting treatment of the non-monetary transaction ( Yes on MPIs 1-6 ). The candidate thoroughly discusses the accounting treatment of the non-monetary transaction and discusses the impact of the issue on the management group bonus ( Yes on all ). AO4 (Assurance — Non-monetary transaction audit procedures ) Discusses a valid risk related to the non-monetary transaction accuracy, valuation and allocation (Yes = explains the risk + why it is a risk, incorporating case facts) You were assessed at C for this assessment opportunity. Good work discussing a relevant audit risk and explaining an associated procedure to mitigate the risk. To move to a CD on future cases, you could provide more procedures for your user. Designs a valid procedure to address the risk identified for the non-monetary transaction ( Yes = procedure is specific, clear, and useful in responding to the risk identified)
RC C C CD 1 Identifies the financial reporting issue related to the facility lease Situation Y 2 Analyze Y 3 — economic benefits transfer (>75% of useful life) Analyze Y 4 — recovery of investment (>90% of net present value of minimum lease payments) Analyze P 5 Recommends how to classify the lease, consistent with analysis Conclude Y 6 Discusses how to initially recognize the lease Analyze Y 7 Discusses how to subsequently measure the lease Analyze P 8 Concludes on the impact of the adjustment on the management group bonus Conclude Y NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. RC NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. RC C CD 1 Analyze Y 2 Analyze Y 3 Designs an additional valid procedure to address the risk identified for the leased facility Analyze N NA The candidate does not address this assessment opportunity. C NC The candidate does not meet the standards for reaching competence. RC C CD Y The candidate attempts to assess the assertion-level risks related to the non-monetary transaction, or attempts to designs a valid procedure to address the risks ( Yes on 1 MPI OR Partial on 2 MPIs ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the non-monetary transaction and designs a valid procedure to address the risks ( Yes on 2 MPIs, including MPI 1 ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the non-monetary transaction and designs 2 valid procedures to address the risks ( Yes on all ). AO5 (Financial Reporting — Leased facility ) You were assessed at RC for this assessment opportunity. You did a good job in using the CPA way in identifying the issue, applying case facts against the ASPE criteria and ultimately provide a recommendation. In order to improve to a level of a C on future cases, ensure you are arriving at the accurate calculations using the case facts as PVMLP calculation was slightly off. Analyzes the lease criteria in relation to case facts: ASPE 3065 — ownership The candidate attempts to discuss the accounting treatment of the leased facility ( Yes on 2 MPIs OR Partial on 4 MPIs ). The candidate discusses the accounting treatment of the leased facility ( Yes on MPIs 1-5 ). The candidate thoroughly discusses the accounting treatment of the leased facility and discusses the impact of the issue on the management group bonus (Yes on at least 6 MPI's, including MPIs 1-5 and MPI 8 ). AO6 (Assurance — Leased facility audit procedures ) Discusses a valid risk related to the lease facility Asset: completeness, accuracy, valuation, allocation (Yes if explains the risk and why it is a risk, incorporating case facts) Liability: completeness You were assessed at C for this assessment opportunity. You were clearly able to identify a relevant audit risk and provide procedure on how to mitigate the risks. Great job outlining how the procedure will be completed. To move to a CD on future cases, try and identify more valid procedures related to the risk. This approach will help you add more breadth and depth in your analysis for your user. Designs a valid procedure to address the risk identified for the leased facility (Yes = procedure is specific, clear and useful in responding to the risk identified) The candidate attempts to assess the assertion-level risks related to the leased facility, or attempts to design a valid procedure to address the risks ( Yes on 1 MPI OR Partial on 2 MPIs ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the leased facility and designs a valid procedure to address the risks ( Yes on 2 MPIs, including MPI 1 ). The candidate assesses the assertion-level risks related to the leased facility and designs 2 valid procedures to address the risks ( Yes on al l). Communication — The candidate prepares a response that is logically organized with good use of headings and bullet points. The response is professional in tone and sufficiently readable in terms of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and acronyms/abbreviations. Memo to Layla Mendez You have been assessed at YES for the Communication AO. Your memo was logically organized and formatted, and it was sufficiently readable. Good that you used headings to separate the issues and bullets to highlight the key points. The tone was professional and sufficiently focused on the user's needs. Overall, your response was easy for the reader to follow.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help